|
Comments: Some commenters proposed that the Department apply the proposed guidelines to employees but with some modifications. Some commenters also expressed problem that if the proposed regulations implement in the employment context, then recipients would confront the impossible condition of possessing to comply with contradictory Title IX and Title VII expectations. One commenter asked for that the Department not adopt the college student-on-pupil harassment definition for school, but to as an alternative undertake a "severe or pervasive" normal for the employment context. One commenter mentioned that elementary and secondary school recipients must make certain that if a scholar discloses info about sexual misconduct by yet another scholar or staff, that all workers should report the information to the Title IX Coordinator. Although an elementary or secondary faculty may possibly demand workforce to report the information and facts to the Title IX Coordinator, a student's report of sexual harassment or observe of sexual harassment or allegations of sexual harassment to any employee of the elementary or secondary university is sufficient to hold the university district liable for a suitable reaction underneath these remaining laws. Commenters argued these Title IX provisions, which they alleged conflict with Title VII, are fewer protective than Title VII, and that the Department really should not offer significantly less security to young children in college than grownups in the workplace. |
|